Summer means long days, warm temps, and miles on the trail.And while we love a good pair of hiking boots, a hiking shoe is ideal for many trail adventures. They’re light and easy to move in, and they keep your feet cool. You’ll give up a bit of ankle support with a shoe, but many find that the increased comfort and performance are well worth the trade-off.

　　This guide combines the perspectives of prolific thru-hiker Chris Carter, consummate woodsman Nick LeFort, and Matt Bento, a former climbing dirtbag who lives in the Eastern Sierra. Between them, theyve spent thousands of miles testing hiking shoes from the eastern forest of Appalachia to granite peaks in California. After all that rambling, the Hoka Speedgoat 6 emerges as this seasons top pick, with the Merrell Moab 3 retains its spot as the best budget shoe for more casual hikers.

　　Were firm believers that hiking shoes can perform better than hiking boots for long-distance hikes and backpacking. With lighter gear becoming mainstream, even beginners can easily get their kit under 30 pounds and negate the need for heavy, all-leather high-top boots. The list below highlights our favorite hiking shoes, field tested and compared side-by-side. Youll find many of our top choices are also excellent trail running shoes.

　　Editor’s Note: Updated February 28th, 2025, we gave our hiking shoes guide a real shake-up, crowning the Hoka Speedgoat 6 as the best overall hiking shoe. We also tested the newly updated Altra Lone Peak 9, and for those who want a hiking shoe thats as tough as a boot, check out the Scarpa Rush 2 Pro GTX.

　　The Best Hiking Shoes of 2025 Best Overall Hiking Shoes: Hoka Speedgoat 6 Best Budget Hiking Shoes: Merrell Moab 3 Best Zero Drop Hiking Shoes: Altra Lone Peak 9 Best Waterproof Hiking Shoe: Scarpa Rush 2 Pro GTX Best Hiking Shoes for Summer Travel: Salomon X Ultra 4 Low Best Hiking Shoes for Technical Approaches: La Sportiva TX4 EVO Hoka Speedgoat 6 $110 at REI$155 at REI

　　Specifications Weight: 1 lb. 3.6 oz. Heel-to-toe drop: 5 mm Waterproof: No Upper: Woven textile Outsole: Vibram Megagrip Pros Very stable Great response Locked-in heel fit Also one of our favorite trail running shoes Cons Upper not as durable as leather Some may find these shoes narrow in the midfoot Chris Carter Now in its sixth iteration, the Hoka Speedgoat 6 ($155) is our favorite hiking shoe and a fine choice for fast and light backpacking. Nothing crazy here, just a great design — a slightly narrow heel with plenty of room for feet to swell in the front, plus a fairly symmetrical shape, make this shoe a great fit for many different foot types. 

　　The Speedgoat is a trail running shoe, one of several we tested that are well-suited to both trail running and hiking. With a fairly plush midsole and a 5 mm drop, it was hard not to run while we evaluated the Speedgoat as a hiking shoe. They are springy and responsive, and have a great balance of sensitivity and support on trail. Compared to a more minimalist zero drop shoe like the Altra Lone Peak 9, they’re stiffer and a bit more supportive, but not as wide or neutral-feeling.

　　We hiked the Speedgoats up steep passes in the Eastern Sierra, where we encountered steep rock steps, often flowing with spring runoff. The Vibram outsoles gripped well on wet rock slabs, and the lugs handled the soft sand and gravel found on lower-elevation trails in the high desert. Even without gaiters, small pebbles, and debris never got in around the snug ankle cuff. 

　　The Speedgoats heels, arch support, and low (ish) volume work in concert to keep your feet solidly locked in place despite the wider toe toebox. Even with the Speedgoats sized for his feet to swell, our tester experienced no slippage when trudging downhill. On the uphill, they’re stiff enough to give you a little extra confidence on slabs and steeper sections of trail.

　　The uppers are a little different from the previous versions, with the upper supposedly being more breathable. We didn’t notice a huge difference between the 5 and the 6 in terms of breathability, but we did test a Gore-tex-lined version and found it noticeably less breathable than the version without Gore-tex. If you live in a dryer western state and don’t encounter much snow on your hikes, we recommend going without the Gore-tex. Your shoes will breathe better and dry faster.

　　The only negatives we can identify here are fit-related, and thats a fairly subjective metric. These felt a little tighter in the mid-foot than the Speedgoat 5s. The plentiful amount of high-density foam means uneven wear from pronation or supination will be more dramatic and have a greater effect on your stride the longer you have your shoes, but that’s an issue with all but the most minimalist hiking shoes.

　　Obviously, fit is king, and if you do happen to fit in the Hoka Speedgoats, we cant recommend them enough as your do-it-all hiking shoes, or a versatile option for trail running. 

　　Specifications Weight: 2 lb., 1 oz. Upper: Pigskin leather and mesh Outsole: Vibram TC5+ Pros Good value Impressive traction and stability for a low-cut hiking shoe Breathable Cons A bit heavy Requires a break-in period for peak comfort Chris Carter It’s no surprise the Merrell Moab 3 ($120) is one of the top-selling hiking shoes. The side ventilation keeps feet cool during warm-weather hikes, and the pigskin leather and mesh upper hold up well through rocky scrambles, long day hikes, and multiday adventures. We like that they provide some of the stability and traction generally found in a hiking boot with the low-top freedom of a shoe.

　　The Moab 3 has a wide, high-volume fit that feels comfortable on a lot of different foot shapes, and while it is stiffer than some of the trail running shoe crossovers like the Lone Peak 9 and the Speedgoat, it will still feel more like a familiar tennis shoe than a boot. Folks who are new to hiking often gravitate to the Moab 3 as they feel very comfortable walking around in the store. Just be aware that roomy can also mean that your foot moves around a lot in the shoe and that can lead to blisters. If your foot slides around in the heels too much, look elsewhere.

　　With the size, lacing techniques, and a good pair of socks, most folks will be able to get a good fit with the Moab 3 for $120, you get a tough mesh/leather combo on the uppers and a durable Vibram outsole. These aren’t the lightest hiking shoes available. And on technical or wet terrain, they didn’t perform as well as shoes like the La Sportiva TX4 EVO, but the Moab 3s are winners for day hikes on regular trails. They’re also available in a waterproof version. Overall, they’re a great choice for a hiker on a budget, or if youre new to hiking.

　　Best Zero Drop Hiking Shoe Altra Lone Peak 9 $140 at REI Mens$140 at REI Womens

　　Specifications Weight: 1 lb. 6.4 oz. Heel-to-toe drop: Upper: Ripstop mesh Outsole: MaxTrac rubber Pros Light weight Wide forefoot for swelling feet Zero drop promotes a healthy stride Quick gaitor attachment points Cons Zero drop takes some getting used to and isnt for everybody Chris Carter The Altra Lone Peak 9 ($140) is a zero drop shoe with a wide fit. Previous iterations of the Lone Peak have long been popular among thru-hikers for its extremely roomy toebox and stable platform. While these aren’t for everyone, a seasoned hiker with fleet feet and a strong pair of legs looking to stack multiple 20-mile days could go far with the venerable Lone Peaks.

　　Comfort is a stand-out feature for the Lone Peaks, as their toebox is wider (or at least feels wider) than any other shoe we’ve tested. A side-by-side comparison of the insoles of the Hoka Speedgoat 6 and the Lone Peak’s insoles clearly shows that they are almost a centimeter wider at the forefoot. As you hike, your feet swell, even more over several days. The Lone Peaks have plenty of space to accommodate the swelling. 

　　Zero Drop means that the height of your heels is the same as the height at the ball of your foot in the shoe. For some folks, this encourages midfoot strikes instead of heel strikes. This isn’t the case for everyone, but for many folks, the neutral positioning of zero drop shoes makes a huge difference over long distances, reducing pain from overuse in the knees and hips, and improving posture. Even if you’re an experienced hiker who’s never worn a zero drop shoe, be conservative and work up to bigger miles in the Lone Peaks before you go for a big day. Getting accustomed to this style of shoe could be the key to long-term comfort.

　　The Lone Peaks mesh uppers are plenty breathable, though “mesh” feels like a misnomer, as the fabric feels tougher and less porous than most mesh fabrics we’ve encountered. A rubber toe bumper on the front and side of the upper adds reinforcement to areas that we often wear through first. A clip-in loop over the midfoot and a Velcro release on the heel pull tab makes it quick and easy to attach a pair of gators for extra protection during snow crossings or tick-infested zones. 

　　Previous versions of the Lone Peak made the top of this list, and the Lone Peak 9s are arguably just as quality as the Lone Peak 8s with some improvements, like the more durable upper. While our team of hikers feels the Hoka Speedgoat 6 is the best hiker for most people, the Altra Lone Peak 9 is the best shoe for anyone who prefers the zero drop design. If you’re getting big miles in every chance you get, you should grab a pair and see if zero drop works for you.

　　Specifications Weight: 1 lb., 8 oz. Waterproof: Yes Upper: Nubuck Leather Outsole: PRESA HIK-01 Pros Durable leather upper Running shoe feel, boot-like performance Waterproof Cons Not very breathable Size up ½ size for better fit (More of PSA than a con) Chris Carter Scarpa describes the Rush 2 Pro GTX ($179) as “trail running shoe” inspired. With so many of our favorite hiking shoes actually being trail running shoes, it’s no surprise that Rush 2 Pro is near the top of our list. The heel-to-do drop and springy response do feel trail runner-esque, but make no mistake, the Rush 2 pros are burly, waterproof hiking shoes that can take way more of a beating than any trail running shoe. The Gore-tex liner seals the deal, making these our favorite hiking shoes for wet conditions. 

　　Aside from the tongue, the Rush 2 Pro has an entirely leather upper. There are a few laser-cut perforations for venting, but breathability is not the top design priority here. These have more of a boot feel in terms of durability and overall waterproofing. Our lead tester post-holed through a foot of snow and made multiple stream crossings in these shoes on an ill-conceived sport-climbing mission. His socks remained dry the entire day, even when water washed over the top of the shoes (but not the ankle cuffs).

　　Where a mesh upper can get snagged on branches and tear, or eventually just wear thin, the Nubuck leather upper on the Rush 2 Pro holds up well to bushwhacking and off-trail scrambling. We wouldn’t hesitate to do some trail work in these shoes, but thats not something we’d do in trail runners. The foam midsole will eventually compress and deform in accordance with your stride over hundreds of miles, but that happens with all footwear. The uppers on these shoes shouldn’t wear out, though. The Presa outsoles performed well on wet rock and snow and have shown no signs of premature wear as of writing. Save these for wet weather, and they’re going to be with you for a long time. 

　　These shoes fit a small, and we’d recommend going up a half size from what you normally wear. Sized and laced correctly, they have a comfortable, stable fit. They aren’t as wide as the Altra Lone Peaks or the Hoka Speedgoats, so if you feel like you’re feet are swimming in either of those shoes, the Rush 2 Pro may fit better.

　　Breathability is not a strong suit for these shoes, so you’ll want something else when you’re exclusively hiking in hot and dry conditions. But if you’re looking for a waterproof hiking shoe that’s going to last, we highly recommend the Scarpa Rush 2 Pro GTX. 

　　Specifications Weight: 1 lb., 6.4 oz. Material: Nylon mesh Best use: Summer hiking and technical trails Top attribute: Breathable and light with plenty of grip Pros Highly breathable Good traction Lightweight Cons Not ideal for technical scrambling on rock and steep terrain Chris Carter The Salomon X Ultra 4 Low is breathable, grippy, and comfortable. If you’re looking for a warm-weather hiking shoe, this is it. The polyester mesh panels help keep feet cool, and at about 1.5 pounds for the pair, they won’t weigh you down.

　　With the mudguards and extended toecap, we never had any problems with rocks or sticks jabbing our feet. And the lugs proved plenty burly even for technical trails.

　　The sole of the X Ultra 4 is surprisingly flexible, which our testers enjoyed. But if you’re looking for something stiff, you may want to choose a different shoe.

　　Another feature you’ll either love or hate is the Quicklace system. Pull the lace, and it locks into the desired tightness. We’ve found it works well and doesn’t need retightening throughout the day. However, it can limit how specific you get on tightening your shoe.

　　All in all, these shoes offer traction and comfort while keeping feet cool. With this Salomon offering, you get a do-it-all shoe for $140. The women’s version seems to run a bit large, so we recommend going down a half-size.

　　Best Hiking Shoes for Technical Approaches La Sportiva TX4 EVO $169 at REI Mens$169 at REI WomensCheck Mens Price at Amazon Mens$122 at Amazon Womens

　　Specifications Weight: 1 lb., 12 oz. Material: Nubuck leather Best use: Technical approaches or rocky scrambles Top attribute: Environmentally responsible construction and materials Pros Extremely sticky rubber Balance between comfort and support Durable and abrasion-resistant upper material Cons Heavy Chris Carter No one is saying you can’t go on a backpacking trip with the La Sportiva TX4 EVO ($169). We just think you’ll find them better adapted to rocky terrain that forces you to scramble around to get where you’re going. That’s where aspects like the Eco-friendly Nubuck upper and the insanely sticky Megagrip outsole will outperform the competition.

　　In the past, we have reviewed the standard TX4s and have loved their balance between stiffness and flexibility. With the EVO model, attention has been paid to using environmentally responsible construction and materials to create a shoe that performs just as well but adds in the feature of being better for the planet. 

　　In testing, we enjoyed the overall durability of the TX4 EVOs as we traversed up and over scree and other rocky outcrops. Our tester lives in Connecticut and a majority of the terrain is composed of trap rock thats known for being sharp and unforgiving. The TX4 EVOs took a serious beating on the way to a trailhead as well as in a situation where they had to climb down from one level of the trail to the next, relying on small footholds. The TX4 EVOs were fantastic in keeping our tester from slipping on the way down. Vibram’s Megagrip outsole is second to none in adventures like this.

　　Approach shoes, like climbing shoes, can be more restrictive due to their lace-to-toe design. But we found that this kept our feet from moving around in the shoe. This proves to be especially beneficial when youre scrambling around and trying to keep your feet from getting jammed up between the rocks. Additionally, after a few good approaches, the TX4 EVOs broke in well enough and are comfortable enough to wear out and about and on casual hikes.

　　Other Rock Solid Hiking Shoes We Tested While the Hiking shoes below didnt make the top of our list, theyre all well-designed and well-constructed. If youre shopping sales or just dont like any of the shoes weve highlighted above, take a look at the best of the rest, and rest assured they wouldnt make the list if they werent quality options.

　　HOKA Anacapa 2 Low GTX $180 at REI Mens$180 at REI Womens

　　Specifications Weight: 1 lb., 14.7 oz. Material: Recycled mesh Best use: Technical hiking over sludgy, slippery terrain Top attribute: Sustainable build with a tacky outsole Pros Sustainably made Sticky Vibram Megagrip outsole with self-cleaning lug pattern Plenty of cushion Cons Runs a bit large Extended heel cushion isnt everyones cup of tea Pretty heavy Chris Carter Hoka has always been about innovation — and can consequently be quite polarizing. From the inception of their brand, the folks at Hoka have churned out futuristic designs with bleeding-edge tech, in wild color schemes that pop off the shelf.

　　True to their experimental nature, the newly minted Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180) brings a unique flair to the traditional hiking shoe last, seemingly forcing people to either end of the spectrum. You either love em, or you hate em, but one things for sure — there are few shoes like them.

　　Senior Editor Chris Carter recently got to spend several days testing the low and mid versions of the new Anacapa 2 in Zion National Park with Hoka developers, putting the shoes through the wringer and truly picking Hokas brain on its interesting design.

　　While its not his steed of choice for long hikes, hes convinced these are some of the more well-designed, and sustainably constructed shoes for those who dont require an aggressive ride while clocking miles in the backcountry. The supremely tacky outsole and thoughtfully placed Meta-Rocker make these shoo-ins for any serious hikers shortlist.

　　To that last point, weve always been fans of Hokas Meta-Rocker technology — a curved silhouette with denser foam placed at strategic points in the midsole, giving each stride a degree of smooth propulsion. The Anacapa features a late-stage Meta-Rocker, which puts the rocker point closer to the toe for added stability with slower paces.

　　Though our editor prefers an early-stage rocker for swifter movement on the trail, this is perfect for those who want stable confidence over variable terrain, and arent too concerned about chasing FKTs. For most hikers, this is the design of choice.

　　Vibram Megagrip — hands down our favorite outsole — decorates the bottom of the shoe. Its performance on slippery, rocky terrain, or muddy, uneven trails is next to none. Qualms weve had with other Hoka outsoles were addressed with this shoe. Vibram can be rendered useless if mud packs in tight around the lugs, making the sole a single, sleek sheet that easily slips around.

　　The Anacapa 2 features a self-cleaning lug pattern that channels mud away from the lugs as you step, forcing it to slide off the sole, and allowing the deep sticky tread to work its magic. This, paired with a GORE-TEX Invisible Fit liner, makes these shoes power players in wet, sloppy conditions.

　　The protruding SwallowTail heel is perhaps the first feature you notice on the Anacapa 2 — and isnt for everyone. It undeniably affords better traction and stability while bombing down uneven hills, but can sometimes snag on roots and rocks (or even the other shoe) as you clunk down trail. The jurys still out on whether we dig this design, but it does provide solid surface area on the steeps.

　　We do find these shoes to be sized a bit large, so make an effort to try them on in-store before snagging a pair. These are also on the heavier (and pricier) end of the spectrum, but the comfort and cushion they afford atone for these sins. Nearly every element of the shoe is designed with recycled components, making this a much more sustainable shoe than the previous iteration, without sacrificing longevity.

　　For all-day comfort and stability on quick weekend outings, or extended journeys through all sorts of climates, the Anacapa 2 GTX would be a stellar companion for any adventure you could drum up.

　　Merrell Moab Speed 2 $140 at REI Mens$105 at REI Womens

　　(Photo/Merrell) Specifications Weight: 1 lb. 8 oz. Drop: 10mm Lug: 4mm Vibram traction Stack height: 34-24mm Midsole: FloatPro Outsole: Vibram TC5+ Pros Bellows tongue keeps shoes debris-free Comfortable and breathable Light on the feet Feels very stable with Lightweight Flexplate tech Cons Pull tabs could be slightly larger Some complaints of sizing issues (try them on first!) Chris Carter Read Review: Bestselling Outdoor Boot in the World Upgrades to a Shoe: Merrell Moab Speed 2 Review Like the popular Merrell Moab 3 (our best budget pick), the Moab Speed 2 ($140) has a wide, comfortable fit. Where the Moab 3 leans more towards stiffness and durability for backpackers, the Speed 2 is more breathable and feels more like a trail running shoe. If you dig the fit of Moab 3 and are hiking or fast packing, mainly in warm conditions, you should check out this speedy entry to the Moab line.

　　Unlike its cousin, the Speed 2 has no leather in its upper, just breathable mesh and TPU, making it significantly more breathable, and vegan. The entire shoe is made from 100% recycled materials. GearJunkie editor Will Brendza tested these shoes during a hot Colorado summer and appreciated the lightweight materials and breathability.

　　The Speed 2 has a Vibram TC5+ rubber outsole that proved sufficiently grippy on smooth river rocks, while the lugs easily found traction in sand and gravel. These shoes are equipped with a full-length flexplate and extra cushioning. In the field, that translates to better feel and response over uneven and loose surfaces.

　　If you’re primarily interested in some hiking shoes for traditional backpacking, stick with the Moab 3s. They’re stiffer and more supportive for carrying heavier loads. But for folks looking to do day hikes or have an ultralight backpacking setup, the Moab Speed 2 is a better choice, and at $140, they’re almost as good a deal as our best budget pick.

　　Adidas Terrex Free Hiker GORE-TEX 2.0 Low $180 at REI Mens$90 at REI Womens

　　Specifications Weight: 2 lbs., 1 oz. Material: Abrasion-resistant upper Best use: Trail running, Thru-hiking Top attributes: Abrasion-resistant upper, cushioning, Continental outsoles Pros Lots of cushion Springy heels Advanced stability Cons They look like Grampa’s lawn mowing shoes Chris Carter The new Adidas Terrex Free Hiker GORE-TEX 2.0 Low ($180) is one of the most comfortable pairs of shoes we have ever worn. In fact, there might not be another shoe rated for hiking and trail running that has anywhere near as much spring in its step as these shoes do. When combined with the Continental outsoles advanced traction on both wet and dry surfaces and overall stability, you’re really in for a treat on the long haul.

　　Adidas designed the Terrex Free Hiker GORE-TEX 2.0 Low to be a good middle ground between a hiking boot and a trail runner. Although we found it a little bit heavier than the standard trail running shoe, considering the double duty these beauties are pulling off, 2 pounds is acceptable.

　　The abrasion-resistant upper and the GORE-TEX lining allowed us to run through trails, fields, muddy ruts, meadows, and paved surfaces without worrying about the shoes getting torn up or soaked on the inside.

　　In terms of overall fitment, the Terrex Free Hiker GORE-TEX 2.0 Low runs roughly half of a size bigger. This was quite a surprise for a shoe with so much cushion. That said, the pair we tested were a size 9 and we experienced slight slipping in the heel due to the factory oversizing. We compensated for this by wearing a heavier sock. Either way, it’s worth noting if you’re going right from the store to the trail.

　　The one gripe we had with the Terrex Free Hiker GORE-TEX 2.0 Low was the choice of colors. The light green color wasn’t much of an issue, but the white foam midsoles and heel turned tan and spotty after a few good runs through a puddle. 

　　Overall, if you’re buying these shoes to look cool with your friends, take a hard pass. But if you’re buying them for extended comfort and stability on all types of terrain then the Terrex Free Hiker GORE-TEX 2.0 Low are the right shoes for you.

　　Danner Trail 2650 $170 at REI Mens$170 at REI Womens

　　Specifications Weight: 1 lb., 8 oz. Material: Leather Best use: Day hikes, dry summer adventures, town-to-trail excursions Top attribute: Out-of-the-box comfort, breathable, stylish Pros Stylish Breathable Grippy outsole Cons Expensive compared to other options Chris Carter Danner is known for making high-quality, long-lasting hiking boots. And this is true of its hiking shoes, too. Inspired by the terrain of the 2,650 miles of the Pacific Crest Trail, the Trail 2650 is built to go the distance.

　　The mesh liner helped keep our feet cool and aided in breathability on hot summer hikes. In addition to the stylish looks, we really appreciate the fantastic grip these provided. We found them comfortable out of the box and suitable for all manner of day hikes.

　　Some testers wished they had more arch support, while others found them a perfect fit. This is a matter of personal preference and foot shape. The Trail 2650 shoe comes in several versions, including waterproof, mesh, and mid styles. Check out our full review of these Danner styles.

　　Oboz Sawtooth X Low $140 at REI Mens$140 at REI Womens$140 at Amazon Mens$140 at Amazon Womens

　　Specifications Weight: 1 lb., 15.6 oz. Material: Oiled nubuck leather and CORDURA fabric mesh Best use: Mid-to-high-mileage backpacking journeys with loads up to 50 lbs. Top attribute: Versatility Pros Grippy outsole Minimal break-in period Durable Cons Heavier than others Take forever to dry out if they get wet Chris Carter Are you looking for a hiking shoe that offers more of a traditional hiking boot design? This below-the-ankle pick could be just what you need. The Sawtooth X Low ($140) slices through harsh terrain better than most mid-height hiking boots, and offers stellar durability with bomb-proof oiled nubuck leather and CORDURA fabric mesh.

　　The new Adaptive Cushioning Technology used in these shoes is an interesting touch. Dual-density rubberized EVA is designed to easily adapt to changing terrain. While we cant say we fully felt the effects of this, this has a cushioned ride to it and a soft heel strike zone with solid shock absorption.

　　This shoe comes out of the box ready to hike. It promotes more foot freedom with a wider toebox and an O fit insole that combats shifting and boosts comfort even on daunting descents.

　　The lug pattern of the Sawtooth X gives plenty of grip, and the toe overlays prevent abrasion. Our testers are happy to report that even after significant abuse, these show little signs of wear. Plus, you can feel good knowing that Oboz plants a tree for every pair of shoes sold.

　　Hiking Shoe Comparison Table

　　Its important to find a hiking shoe that will survive the rigors of long backpacking journeys and casual day hikes alike; (photo/Chris Carter) How We Tested Hiking Shoes In our search for the best hiking shoes, we spent months on the trail. From the dry Arizona desert to the hot and humid Appalachian Trail, and the Rocky Mountains — we’ve logged a lot of miles.

　　The recommendations on this list are the result of intensive testing and thorough observation. “Hiking” is a broad term, and not all hikers have the same needs. While compiling our roundup, we considered each individual models intended use. We paid careful attention to comfort, stability, outsole traction and grip, and long-term durability.

　　Our Expert Testers Senior Editor Chris Carter took the wheel on this guide in August 2022, and has been rummaging around his shoe rack and combing the internet ever to bring you the most current, deserving selection possible. Chris has thru-hiked the Triple Crown of long trails in the United States: the Pacific Crest Trail, the Continental Divide Trail, and the Appalachian Trail. Hes plodded back and forth across the country in countless different models of shoes and knows the importance of dialing in on the perfect fit for various adventures and terrain.

　　More recently, hiker and GearJunkie contributor Nick LeFort has been taking the latest and greatest hiking shoes for a spin. Nick is a former boot fitter who knows his way around a Brannock device and can make solid recommendations for any foot shape.

　　Additionally, Gearjunkie editors Will Brendza and Matt Bento have added their 2 cents and then some to this guide, testing and reviewing the most recent updates to popular models like the Hoka Speedgoat and the Altra Lone Peak 9. As a Journalist covering outdoor gear and news, Will has tested shoes and boots from every major brand. Matt spent his college years fitting boots and shoes at a small outfitter in Greensboro, North Carolina and then moved to Yosemite where he worked as a Ranger and on the Yosemite Search and Rescue team. Now as an editor at GearJunkie, he tests and totally trashes all manner of footwear while he explores his big backyard in Bishop, CA.

　　Our Testing Grounds We test hiking shoes on and off trail, mostly in the western US. Will Brendza lives in the Denver area where he has quick access to local canyons and trails, and Rocky Mountian National park is just a short drive away. Matt Bento can be in on the trail and trudging in the John Muir Wilderness and on to Sequoia National Park after a 15-minute drive from his doorstep. Both Mountain areas offer a wide range of trail conditions throughout the year thanks to dramatic elevation gains. On the same day, our testers find themselves scrambling up smooth rock slabs, crossing snow fields, and bombing down loose gravel and scree, all excellent scenarios for evaluating hiking shoes. The American West is pretty dry, and our testers generally shy away from waterproof shoes with Gore-tex in favor of more breathable, non-waterproof models. To even out their bias, tester Nick LeFort is out in Middletown, Connecticut where an average of 48 of rain often makes a waterproof hiking shoe a necessity.

　　Bench Testing We strive to have as many shoes in hand as possible for comparative testing. Pulling out insoles to measure them with calipers and compare their shapes, walking laps up the same hill with a different shoe on each foot, and standing in a bucket full of water are all in a days work for our shoe testers. These tests give us quick, objective data points that help us decide which shoes are the best. We use our detailed write-ups to expand upon the subjective — how the shoes feel underfoot, how they respond to different terrain, and whether or not we get blisters or hotspots. Fit is the most important aspect to consider when shopping for a pair of hiking shoes, and also the hardest thing to dicerne from reading reviews on the internet, so we expound on how a shoe fits as much as we can.

　　If you need to carry super heavy loads or are just looking for some more ankle support, be sure to check out our guide to the best hiking boots. For a women-specific perspective, have a look at the best womens hiking shoes.

　　Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose the Best Hiking Shoes

　　From weekend treks in the mountains to multi-month thru-hikes, each of our testers has spent significant time in the shoes highlighted on this list; (photo/Chris Carter) From day hiking to thru-hiking, the right pair of hiking shoes can become the most beloved and essential piece of gear in your kit. As the primary contact between you and the trail, your shoes make your adventures possible, and it’s imperative that they’re reliable.

　　While some still prefer the ankle support and robust structure of hiking boots, more and more hikers and backpackers are opting for the weight savings and nimble performance of hiking shoes. For any hiking endeavor, good-quality shoes are more than capable of handling a wide variety of terrain.

　　Because there are so many styles and variables, selecting the best hiking shoes for your unique needs can be difficult. In this guide, we include everything you need to know to select a pair of shoes that will treat your feet well and instill confidence in your stride.

　　Hiking Shoes vs. Boots

　　While hiking shoes dont offer quite as much support as boots, they are lighter and faster, allowing you to cruise through the miles with ease; (photo/Honey McNaughton) One of the main differences between hiking shoes and boots is the height. Whereas shoes have a below-the-ankle height, hiking boots offer full ankle support and high-top construction. What you give up in ankle support, you make up for in weight savings and out-of-the-box comfort.

　　Hiking shoes are great for day hikes, smooth trails, and anytime you want to go fast and light. For bigger backpacking trips with a heavier backpacking pack, you may want to consider a full hiking boot. That said, we know thru-hikers who swear by lightweight hiking shoes and day-trippers who won’t head out without their boots. It’s all about preference.

　　And while there isn’t a single best hiking shoe for everyone out there, we’ve broken down this list into categories to help find the best hiking shoe for you.

　　Weight

　　Hokas Anacapa 2 GTXs boast major cushion — at the cost of more weight than most; (photo/Chris Carter) In recent years, hiking shoe technology has moved toward low-profile and lightweight designs. Modern fabrics and soles manage to be thinner and lighter without sacrificing performance on the trail. For long hikes and thru-hikes, the benefits of a light pair of shoes only grow as the miles wear on.

　　While many burly hiking boots weigh over 4 pounds per pair, hiking shoes tend to weigh around 2 pounds or less. If you like to go fast on the trail, or if you plan to do some trail running in your hiking shoes, light is undoubtedly better.

　　Yes, shaving ounces sometimes does reduce long-term durability. However, lots of pairs of shoes on this list are more than capable of holding up just as long as a hefty pair of boots.

　　With modern materials and advancements in design, you don’t need to give up durability to cut weight and gain comfort. The shoes on this list range from speedy lightweight models, like Hokas Speedgoat 5s at 1 pound, 4.6 ounces, to beefy but stalwart shoes like the Oboz Sawtooth X Low, tipping the scales at 1 pound, 15.6 ounces.

　　Lightweight hiking shoes, like Hokas Speedgoats, are key for limiting fatigue on long trips like a thru-hike; (photo/Chris Carter) Comfort and Fit Comfort is the most important factor for any pair of active footwear. The shape of the human foot varies wildly, and the shoe that feels comfortable to someone else might not be comfortable for you. Feet can be wide or narrow, arches can be high or flat, and heels can be bulbous or low volume.

　　When selecting a pair of hiking shoes, there is really no substitute for trying them on and paying attention to how they feel in action. Most people will want to seek out a fit that minimizes negative space but does not actively constrict or compress their feet or toes.

　　If your foot moves in the shoe, you’ll likely be dealing with blisters before long. In general, hiking shoes tend to be more comfortable thanhiking boots. It’s totally possible to find a pair that you can happily wear all day long.

　　Testing the cozy Hoka Anacapa 2 GTX in Zion National Park with Hy Rosario, one of the shoes primary designers; (photo/Chris Carter) Waterproof There are pros and cons to hiking in a pair of shoes that are billed as “waterproof.” When hiking on muddy and wet terrain, waterproof hiking shoes help keep your feet dry and comfortable. When your feet are wet, you’ll be more likely to develop blisters and other foot issues.

　　However, waterproof hiking shoes also tend to be warmer and less breathable. Once wet, waterproof shoes usually take longer to fully dry.

　　Most waterproof hiking shoes include a membrane in their liner (GORE-TEX is the most common) that keeps water from reaching the inside of the shoe. In addition, many hiking shoes are treated with a durable water-repellent coating, which can be reapplied after it wears off.

　　While it is good to prioritize dry feet, it is also important to remember that by sealing moisture out, you’re also sealing it in. Shoes with a waterproof liner are prone to becoming hot and sweaty in warm or humid conditions.All hiking shoes will soak through if they get very wet or become fully submerged, even if they’re labeled as waterproof.

　　Durability and Materials

　　Hiking shoes need to be durable and supportive for use on all sorts of rough terrain; (photo/Honey McNaughton) The two primary areas of a hiking shoe that will suffer the most from wear are the upper and the outsole. On the top of the shoe, the upper is the material that determines how waterproof, durable, and breathable the shoe is overall.

　　Most hiking shoes include an upper made from nylon, mesh, leather, or a combination. Nylon is lightweight and breathable, but it may not hold up well to repeated abrasion.

　　Mesh tends to be the least hardy, but it is super breathable and makes a comfortable choice for the tongue of a shoe. Leather is significantly less breathable, and it is often found on heavier-duty hiking shoes because it holds up to wear.

　　Although heavier and burlier hiking shoes often have the advantage of durability, many modern lightweight options are impressively long-lasting, too. Softer rubber outsoles will wear through faster than dense, firm outsoles.

　　Hiking Shoes Lifespan Its important that you dont wear your hiking shoes (or boots) for longer than you should. Just because your toes arent hanging out of holes on the side, doesnt mean the shoe has more life in it. Each manufacturer recommends different mileage for each shoe, but as a general rule, you want to replace your hiking shoes after 300-800 miles.

　　Many trail running shoes-turned-hiking shoes (such as Altras Lone Peak and Brooks Cascadia) are not designed to handle the same level of abuse as dedicated hiking shoes. Its a good idea to retire shoes like these after between 300 and 500 miles.

　　Stalwart hiking shoes (like Merrells Moab or Salomons X Ultra 4 Low Aero), crafted for endless days on trail wearing a heavy pack will last you between 500 and 800 miles before you should lay them to rest.

　　Its important to keep a rough estimate of the number of miles on your hiking shoes to avoid injury on trail. We like to keep a running document on our computer with a list of what trips weve done on each shoe, and how many miles were added each time. This may not be necessary for you personally — but we clock a heck of a lot of miles each year and have several different shoes in rotation.

　　If youre going to rely on a pair of shoes to carry you across brutal, uneven terrain, you had better make sure they are built with durability in mind; (photo/Chris Carter) Stability and Support A shoe’s support comes from the construction of its components, including the sole and the midsole. These underfoot layers can be thick and sturdy, or thin and floppy.

　　For hiking, most people prefer a shoe that is stiff and stable through the middle part of the foot, but slightly more flexible near the toe. This allows your foot to feel supported without sacrificing the ability to flex your toes.

　　Most hiking shoes have a low-cut ankle collar. If you are seeking lots of ankle support, hiking boots are probably a better choice.

　　Lacing Systems

　　Make sure you are able to achieve a dialed fit with your hiking shoes before setting off on any adventure; (photo/Emily Malone) The way a shoe laces up can make or break your big-mile adventure. Not being able to find a comfortably snug fit or fighting with constant loosening are both frustrating trail experiences.

　　Some shoes have a single-pull system. And while it looks delicate and breakable, we’ve had no issues with long-term durability. Many testers find this system allows for a dialed fit, and we appreciate the ability to make quick adjustments.

　　That said, it’s harder to create a more custom tightness with quick laces. They tend to provide the same tension across the entire foot. If you prefer to create pockets of snugness across your foot, go with a traditional lacing system.

　　Traction

　　Some rock climbs, like big walls in Yosemite, require durable, tacky approach shoes like La Sportivas TX4s for long technical approaches and walk-offs; (photo/Ryan Bode) The bottom of a good hiking shoe will feature a firm and grippy outsole. Vibram is the most common manufacturer of outsoles, although some footwear companies make their own.

　　A sturdy outsole is a major feature that sets a hiking shoe apart from a sneaker or tennis shoe. On a wide range of surfaces from loose scree to slick rock, a good hiking shoe will maintain reliable traction.

　　Many hiking shoe soles are designed to specialize in certain types of terrain. If you’ll be regularly hiking through unstable surfaces like deep mud, you’ll want a sole with firm, large rubber lugs underfoot.

　　If you plan to do a lot of scrambling and smearing your feet on slabs of rock, a soft and sticky rubber sole with a flat toe edge is the way to go. Many entry-level hiking shoes will include a versatile sole that will perform fairly well on any hiking surface.

　　Some manufacturers have specific, niche approach shoes for technical rock scrambling on long approaches and walk-offs of big rock climbs. These shoes, like the La Sportiva TX4 in this guide, have super tacky rubber, and midsoles designed for smearing and adhering to rocks.

　　Approach hiking shoes help you navigate rocky terrain with ease while trekking to your next climb; (photo/Greg Petliski) Breathability A shoe’s breathability comes from the materials that make up its construction. Areas of open synthetic mesh and woven nylon will greatly increase breathability.

　　Meanwhile, large patches of leather and waterproof membranes like GORE-TEX will decrease breathability, but add significant durability. A breathable shoe will feel cooler and less sweaty over the course of a rigorous hiking day, but usually wont last as long.

　　However, breathable shoes are more likely to soak through to your socks when hiking in the rain or trudging through puddles. Shoes billed as “waterproof” may feel hot and sweaty at times, but they also help keep mud and moisture from reaching your socks and feet.

　　Mesh paneling on the sides boosts breathability on hot treks; (photo/Chris Carter) Price Value Unlike their all-leather, high-top counterparts, hiking shoes are fairly inexpensive and rarely cost more than $200. However, there is value in longevity, and a comfy breathable pair with breathable synthetic uppers just isnt going to last as long as a durable leather beater. Shoes with a waterproof breathable liner like Gore-tex will also cost more. Note that many of the shoes on our list are available in a waterproof version for a little bit more money.

　　Budget The Merrell Moab3 is the least expensive shoe we tested and our top pick for the best budget hiking shoe. It isnt waterproof and has a combination of Nubuck leather and mesh for its upper. The Moab 3 is on the heavy side, and they are designed strictly as hiking shoes, not for trail running. While they have a wide, accommodating fit that isnt for everyone, especially those with narrow feet. The Oboz Sawtooths ($135) have a similar design and are a worthy alternative if the Moab 3s dont quite fit. Additionally, the Merrel Moab Speed 2s offer a lighter, more breathable alternative for just $140

　　Mid-Tier Most of the shoes on this list cost from $140 to $180, and our favorite shoes fall in this tier. If this is your price range then the debate should be between the Hoka Speedgoat 6 ($155) and the Altra Lone Peak 9 ($140). Both are trail runner crossovers built to go long distances but offer very different fits and features. If youre looking for a shoe that fits like your road running shoes, but has more cushion is more durable for the trail, then the Speedgoat 6 is the way. The Altra Lone Peak 9 is a zero drop shoe with a wide forefoot so your toes can fully splay out. They are well regarded among thru-hikers, but take some getting used to, as they work your calfs a bit more than a show with moderate heel-to-toe drop.

　　Premium The HOKA Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180) and the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker GORE-TEX 2.0 Low ($180) are the most expensive shoes on the list. The extra cost is obviously attributed to the Gore-tex liners. While not as breathable as having no waterproof liner at all, a Gore-tex liner is still the industry standard in waterproof, breathable membranes. Companies who want to use Gore-tex in their shoes need to have each model thoroughly tested, evaluated, and then approved by Gore-tex. This process and the materials all add to the cost of the shoes. Our favorite waterproof shoe is the Scarpa Rush 2 Pro GTX ($179) and its also one of the more durable shoes we tested, so if youre looking for something with a longer lifespan, its a good choice.

　　Solid hiking shoes can cost a pretty penny, but are some of the most important elements of your hiking kit; (photo/Chris Carter) Frequently Asked Questions What are the best shoes for hiking? The best hiking shoes are the ones that fit your feet comfortably and allow you to enjoy your time on the trail. When combing through the options, your first priorities should be fit and comfort.

　　Durability, support, and traction are important, too, but ultimately none of that matters if the shoes hurt your feet.

　　Also, no single pair of hiking shoes will be the very best for every application. The materials, design, and tread pattern will add up to a set of strengths and weaknesses in every shoe.

　　Hiking shoes vs. hiking boots: Which is better? The current momentum in hiking footwear has shifted away from bulky ankle-high boots in favor of nimble, lower-cut hiking shoes. Hiking boots are heavier, and weight carried on your feet can feel very uncomfortable at the end of a full day.Switching out a 4-pound pair of boots for a 2-pound pair of hiking shoes can make a huge difference in your performance.

　　Also, many hiking boots have very stiff soles that keep the foot from flexing properly. Many boots are constructed with nonbreathable materials, meaning that your feet are more likely to get sweaty and form blisters. That said, hiking boots can be a great option for those who prefer lots of ankle stability or underfoot stiffness.

　　Hiking shoes are generally similar in shape to a pair of trainers or tennis shoes.The difference is that hiking shoes are built with durable materials and feature an outsole that is made to grip dirt, rocks, and mud. Compared to boots, hiking shoes feel light, nimble, and somewhat less supportive.

　　Whether or not you decide to trot around in shoes or boots is entirely up to you, and depends on the type of adventure you plan to go on; (photo/Chris Carter) Do I need waterproof hiking shoes? That depends. Keep in mind that no pair of hiking shoes is entirely water-resistant. Although some are marketed this way, full submersion in a puddle for more than a few seconds will soak through just about any pair of hiking shoes. Also, because they are low cut around the ankle, water is prone to getting in at the top of the shoe anyway.

　　Still, waterproof shoes do include membranes, like GORE-TEX, that can keep a significant amount of moisture out. When walking through dewy grass or muddy trails, waterproof shoes will keep your socks and feet drier than non-waterproof shoes.

　　Shoes with waterproof membranes are less breathable. If you will be hiking in hot and dry areas, you’ll probably feel more comfortable in non-waterproof shoes.

　　Waterproof hiking shoes can be game-changers if wet conditions or muddy terrain is in your future; (photo/Chris Carter) Is it OK to hike in sneakers? For the most part, sneakers are designed to perform on artificial surfaces such as asphalt or cement. Many sneakers have flimsy soles and lack the appropriate level of support that is needed for hiking on uneven terrain.Additionally, sneakers are less likely to hold up to the abrasion and wear that is common while hiking on rough trails.

　　If you plan to mostly walk on flat trails in urban parks or backyards, you’ll probably be just fine with sneakers. However, for hikes of any significant length — and especially backpacking — hiking shoes are a much better choice.

　　Are barefoot shoes good for hiking? Barefoot shoes are designed to allow your foot to flex naturally with every step. Thanks to their thin and flexible materials, barefoot shoes let you feel the texture of the trail in the soles of your feet.

　　With each step, the tissues of your feet directly respond to the trail, conforming and contracting as needed. As the name suggests, the experience is similar to walking barefoot.

　　Whilebarefoot shoesare known for helping hikers and runners develop strong feet, they do take some getting used to. If you have been hiking in boots or hiking shoes, the transition to barefoot shoes will need to be gradual. If you do too much barefoot shoe hiking too soon, you may experience discomfort or quickly develop an injury.

　　Barefoot shoes lack insulation. They also will not protect your feet from sharp objects underfoot and may be quick to wear out. While some experienced hikers have made the transition to barefoot shoes, we generally do not recommend them to beginners.

　　Comfortable hiking shoes that fit well are some of the most important elements of your hiking kit; (photo/Honey McNaughton)

　　The Best Hiking Boots of 2025 If youre looking for the best hiking boots, look no further. Weve tested dozens of hiking boots over hundreds of miles to help you stay happy and comfortable on the trail.

　　The Best Hiking Boots for Women in 2025 • We tested the best hiking boots for women from Scarpa, Merrell, Salomon, La Sportiva, and more to help you find the best option for your needs and budget.