As a critical connection between you and your bike, finding the best mountain bike shoes is very important. Good shoes provide stability, control, and protection while delivering power into the pedals and hopefully remaining comfortable in the process.

　　Different styles of riding have different demands with cross-country, trail, enduro, and gravity riders all seeking varying performance characteristics from their footwear. To help you sort through all the options, we gathered a diverse selection of 18 of the best clipless mountain bike shoes on the market to test and compare.

　　Over the course of several months, lead tester Jeremy Benson took each pair to task on trail rides, shuttle laps, cross-country loops, and even some long gravel grinds while assessing each model on important factors like comfort, pedaling efficiency, stability, walkability, and foot protection to find the best shoes for each type of rider.

　　From the top-rated Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA to the adventure-ready Pearl Izumi X-Alp Summit, youll find our favorite clipless mountain bike shoes for all styles of riding below. To see all the models we tested at a glance, check out our comparison chart. If you need help figuring out what mountain bike shoes you need, be sure to read through our comprehensive buyers guide and price value section at the end of this article.

　　Editors Note: We updated this guide on September 25, 2024, with the addition of the affordable Ride Concepts Accomplice Clip BOA and a new Price Value section that may be helpful when making a purchase decision.

　　The Best Mountain Bike Shoes of 2024 Best Overall Trail Mountain Bike Shoes: Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA Best Budget Trail Mountain Bike Shoes: Specialized 2FO Roost Clip Best Overall Cross Country Mountain Bike Shoes: Shimano S-Phyre XC9 Best Budget Cross Country Mountain Bike Shoes: Crankbrothers Candy Lace Best Mountain Bike Shoes on a Tight Budget: Giro Berm Best Gravity Mountain Bike Shoes: Fox Union BOA Best Adventure and Bike Packing Shoes: Pearl Izumi X-Alp Summit Best Overall Mountain Bike Shoes Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA Specs Weight (pair) 844 g (size 43.5) Closure BOA Li2 dial and upper velcro strap Intended use Trail, enduro Available sizes 5-15 US (half sizes 5.5 12.5)

　　Pros Comfortable Perfect level of sole stiffness Grippy soles work well when hiking Ankle gaiter helps keep debris out of shoes They look awesome Cons Moderately expensive Ripstop upper is harder to keep clean Jeremy Benson Building off the success of the original Mallet mountain bike shoes, Crankbrothers recently added a new model to its lineup, the Mallet Trail BOA. While it shares similar looks and design to its more gravity-oriented sibling, the new Trail version has some new features and an all-around performance that we feel makes it the best mountain bike shoe of its kind on the market.

　　We are huge fans of the Crankbrothers Mallet (non-trail version), but the Mallet Trail is the shoe weve been waiting for. While the silhouette, closures, and foot protection are similar, Crankbrothers stiffened up the pedaling platform, gave it a new rubber outsole, and redesigned the uppers with a completely new material. The result is one of the most well-rounded trail and enduro mountain bike shoes that weve ever put on.

　　Crankbrothers nailed the sole stiffness with the new Mallet Trail. The fiber-reinforced shank is adequately stiff, so you wont feel like youre wasting energy on pedal-heavy trail rides, yet its just forgiving enough not to beat up your feet on long, rough descents. Thats coupled with a bit of EVA foam that helps mute trail feedback to keep the feet feeling fresh on the downhills.

　　The entire sole is covered in Match MC1 mid-friction rubber with a new tread design. The gum-colored sole looks awesome paired with the black uppers, and the large oval-shaped lugs provide stability on the pedals and good traction off the bike. A little rocker and flex in the toes allows you to walk relatively normally, while the wider, horizontal lugs at the toe and heel provide grip when youre inevitably forced to push your bike up the hill. The Match Box cleat mount track has a large adjustment range that should suit everyones preferences.

　　The upper is made of a tough ripstop material with an abrasion-resistant layer covering the forefoot. The uppers are fairly thin to keep the weight down, but the toe box and heel are reinforced for impact protection, and the ankle collar is nicely cushioned. A stretchy gaiter extends a bit above the cuff and helps prevent debris from getting into the shoes.

　　The BOA Li2 dial tightens the shoe effectively over the midfoot while a hook and loop strap secures it at the top. If youre not into BOA closures, Crankbrothers also makes the Mallet Trail Lace ($170). We found these shoes to have a slightly wider than average width and volume, and our size 43.5 EU (10 U.S.) test pair fit true to size for length.

　　Just like Goldilocks, weve been waiting for a mountain bike shoe that is just right, and the Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA is it.

　　$200 at AmazonCheck Price at Backcountry Best Budget Trail Mountain Bike Shoes Specialized 2FO Roost Clip Specs Weight (pair) 750 g (43.5) Closure Laces Intended use Trail riding Available sizes 36-49 EU (half sizes 38.5-46.5)

　　Pros Reasonable price Lightweight compared to similar shoes Versatile Good power transfer Good walkability Cons Roomy in the forefoot Difficult to tighten shoe over forefoot Non-reinforced eyelets are susceptible to damage Jeremy Benson Specialized makes a full line of shoes for all types of riding, with the 2FO models covering the needs of riders ranging from trail to downhill. The budget-friendly 2FO Roost Clip ($130) and its flat-pedal twin, the 2FO Roost Flat, were greeted with much fanfare when they were launched a short time ago. While not the least expensive shoe we tested, we feel its ratio of price to performance makes it one of the best values out there. This versatile trail riding shoe is impressively lightweight, has casual styling, and has a well-rounded performance within its intended application.

　　Specialized markets the 2FO Roost Clip as a shoe that can seamlessly transition from riding to post-ride activities, and they gave it an understated style. Hidden beneath that casual appearance are some great features that help it perform out on the trail. A 3/4 length Stiff Lollipop nylon composite plate runs from the cleat mount area back and provides a surprisingly solid pedaling platform. The Landing Strip cleat box offers ample adjustment that should allow most riders to position their cleats in their preferred location.

　　At the front of the shoe, the sole flexes quite naturally, allowing for a relatively natural gait whether youre pushing your bike up a technical section of trail or wandering around the grocery store after your ride, and the full-coverage SlipNot FG rubber soles provide great traction on a wide range of surfaces and interface well with pedal bodies for lateral stability.

　　The shoes have a relaxed fit and incorporate Specializeds Body Geometry construction and footbeds designed to optimize your leg alignment, and we found that they cradle and secure the midfoot and heel very nicely. Our test pair fit true to their EU size for length. Simple laces tighten the shoes over the top of the foot, and the uppers are constructed from supple synthetic leather that is lined with breathable AirMesh material that wicks away sweat and adds a little cushioning. The midsole features EVA foam that helps to dampen vibration, and there is a little added protection in the form of a rubber bumper that wraps around the front of the toes.

　　All this comes at a shockingly low weight of just 750g for our size 43.5 test pair, which is lighter than most comparable shoes on the market. Our only real gripe with the 2FO Roost Clip is the roomy fit in the forefoot and the inability to tighten that portion of the shoe for a more precise fit. That said, this will be fine for those who dont require the tightest fit up at the front of the shoe or for those who have slightly higher volume or wider-than-average feet. If youve got a lower-volume foot, the Ride Concepts Accomplice BOA ($150) performs similarly but has a much snugger fit.

　　Still, we feel the Specialized 2FO Roost Clip is a solid option that will meet most riders needs without breaking the bank, and theyll look pretty good doing it, too.

　　Check Price at EvoCheck Price at Backcountry Best Overall Cross-Country Mountain Bike Shoes Shimano S-Phyre XC9 Specs Weight (pair) 616 g (43.5) Closure Dual BOA dials Intended use XC, gravel, cyclocross Available sizes 38-48 EU, (half sizes: 40.5-46.5)

　　Pros Excellent pedaling efficiency Super lightweight Well-ventilated Comfortable Comes in a wide version Cons Limited foot protection Very expensive Relatively narrow fit Limited damping in sole can cause fatigue over rough terrain Jeremy Benson If you look around the starting line of any professional cross-country, gravel, or cyclocross race, Shimanos flagship cross-country race shoe, the S-Phyre XC9 ($450), is one of the most common models youll see. This top-of-the-line shoe has been around for many years and has seen incremental updates to help improve its performance while maintaining its signature, recognizable style and top-shelf performance. It has some stiff competition from other high-end XC models, but the S-Phyre XC9 is still our favorite.

　　One of its standout features, of course, is its exceptional pedaling efficiency facilitated by the carbon fiber composite sole that is ultra-stiff with a stiffness index of 11 on Shimanos scale. There is virtually zero flex in this sole, and all of your precious watts are transferred directly into the pedals. Dual BOA Li2 dials and a well-designed upper provide a very snug and secure fit that is not only comfortable but helps to maximize your power throughout the entire pedal stroke and helps enhance control and stability. Weighing in at just 616 g for the pair in size 43.5, the XC9s superlight weight enhances efficiency even further.

　　The S-Phyre XC9 has a very precise fit that is on the narrow side of the spectrum in the regular width. Fortunately, they make a wide version of this shoe as well for those whose feet are wider than average. The closure system wraps around the foot for a very snug and secure hold, and the supple synthetic leather uppers conform to the feet very nicely. The thin, high-density footbed has adjustable arch support, and the textured material in the heel pocket locks the foot in and helps prevent any unwanted heel lift. These shoes essentially become an extension of your body. The heavily perforated uppers also do a great job of ventilating and allowing heat and moisture to escape.

　　Other than the immediate cleat mount zone, the carbon sole is completely covered in Shimanos Ultread rubber. This helps to not only protect the carbon from damage but adds grip during those inevitable dismounts. The toe and heel feature aggressive lugs for additional traction in loose soils or mud, and the cleat mount zone is bordered by pontoons that interface with the pedal body and provide lateral stability. Shimano also includes a set of metal spikes that can be installed up at the toes for extra traction in extreme conditions you might encounter in a muddy cyclocross race. A rigid plastic heel cup and some light reinforcement around the toes add a small level of foot protection.

　　Given their outstanding performance, our complaints about the S-Phyre XC9 are few. As mentioned above, the fit of the latest version is relatively narrow, and we recommend that people try these on before they buy to ensure they work for your feet. Like most cross-country shoes, they also offer very little in the way of foot protection, and its best to avoid doing much walking or hike-a-bike in them. The price is also pretty hard to overlook, but it may be worth it for those seeking the performance this shoe provides. Like the sound of the S-Phyre XC9, but want to save $150? The Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) is worth a look.

　　Learn more in our in-depth comparison of the Shimano XC9 vs. XC1 mountain bike shoes.

　　Check Price at Backcountry Best Budget Cross Country Mountain Bike Shoes Crankbrothers Candy Lace Shoes Specs Weight (pair) 746 g (size 43.5) Closure Laces Intended use XC, light trail, gravel Available sizes 5 15 US (half sizes 5.5 12.5)

　　Screenshot Pros Reasonable price Classy looks Good pedaling efficiency Comfortable Decent hiking traction for an XC shoe Cons Not as stiff as high-end options Limited foot protection Jeremy Benson Crankbrothers recently leveraged their experience making some of the best trail and gravity mountain bike shoes on the market to create their first cross-country and gravel riding shoe, the Candy Lace. While this may be the brands first foray into this style of footwear, they created an undeniably great-looking, comfortable, and well-rounded cross-country mountain bike shoe at a reasonable price.

　　Borrowing some style cues from the new Mallet Trail BOA, the Candy Lace has a super clean and classy aesthetic. The seamless synthetic uppers, lace closures, and contrasting gum soles give them timeless appeal, and the black color we tested looks great — they also come in blue and white.

　　We tested a size 43.5 EU (10 US) and found they fit true to size with a lower volume that worked very well for our tester. Despite an initially tight feel, the synthetic uppers broke in nicely after the first few rides. The lace closure makes it easy to get even tension over the foot, and an elastic lace retainer keeps them tidy while you ride. Laces arent quite as user-friendly as BOA systems, but they help to keep the price of these shoes reasonable and are inexpensive to replace if/when the time comes.

　　Crankbrothers gave the Candy Lace a fiber-reinforced nylon sole that provides a solid pedaling platform. They arent wildly stiff like some of the premium race shoes, but they dont feel inefficient, nor do they beat your feet up over rougher terrain. The entire sole is wrapped in Match MC1 rubber with aggressive lugs on the toe and heel, and broad pontoons border the cleat box. For an XC-style shoe, the Candy Lace walks pretty well and has great traction in loose conditions.

　　The toebox and heel are reinforced for some foot protection, but like similar shoes, they dont offer much. They also arent the stiffest, but for non-racers, thats not necessarily a bad thing, either. Perforations above the toe and on the side of the foot help them breathe, but these arent the airiest shoes around. If you ride in the heat regularly, the super-airy Giro Sector ($240) will cost you a bit more but provide much more ventilation.

　　For cross-country or gravel enthusiasts, the Crankbrothers Candy Lace hits the sweet spot of pedaling efficiency, comfort, walkability, style, and affordability.

　　Check Price at BackcountryCheck Price at Jenson USA Best on a Tight Budget Giro Berm Specs Weight (pair) 910 g (44) Closure 2 Velcro straps Intended use General trail riding Available sizes 39-50 EU (whole sizes only)

　　Pros Very reasonable price Comfortable Relatively casual style Decent power transfer Easy to walk in Cons Heavier weight Not the best power transfer No half sizes Jeremy Benson Mountain biking is an expensive sport, and it can be a challenge to find a decent entry-level clipless shoe for less than $100. The Giro Berm ($80) bucks that trend with a very wallet-friendly price, a high level of comfort, and a respectable on-trail performance. These shoes wont blow you away with any one aspect of their performance, but they are simple and effective, leaving little to complain about, especially when you take the price into consideration.

　　With two broad Velcro straps as the closure, getting into, out of, and adjusting tension over the foot is quick and easy. Our size 44 test pair fit true to size in length, and the width is fairly average. Theres nothing particularly remarkable about their fit, but we found them to be surprisingly comfortable and very easy to get along with. Theres a decent amount of padding about the heel, some light reinforcement in front of the toes, and they offer protection similar to many trail-riding shoes. Despite their appearance, they also proved to be fairly well-ventilated, with a large mesh panel over the toes and a few smaller mesh panels by the instep, allowing for better-than-expected breathability.

　　The soles arent super stiff, but theyre not meant to be, either. Under power, you can feel the sole flex slightly, especially when compared to stiffer XC shoes, but it isnt egregious, and we didnt find that it caused foot or calf fatigue on the climbs or descents. That sole flex goes the other way, too, and from the cleat mount area forward, it allows for a very natural walking motion. The outsole is fully covered in grippy rubber with a unique tread design that provides excellent traction on loose surfaces and rock. The cleats themselves sit just low enough to avoid clicking on the floor when you walk, and the tread on either side interfaces well with pedal bodies. Our test pair also came with a cover that bolts into the cleat holes, so you can use these shoes with flat pedals, too.

　　Now, no one will mistake these shoes for their high-end counterparts, but thats also not the point. The Giro Berm is a great entry point to clipless mountain bike shoes that are sure to satisfy the needs of most new recreational riders. If youve got a bit of flexibility in the budget, youll find a step up in performance with the Specialized 2FO Roost Clip ($130) with a stiffer sole, more size options, and better style, too.

　　$60 at AmazonCheck Price at Backcountry Best Mountain Bike Shoes for Gravity Riding Fox Union BOA Specs Weight (pair) 876 g (9.5 US) Closure Dual BOA dials Intended use Gravity, enduro, aggressive trail Available sizes 37-47 (half sizes 41.5-45.5)

　　Pros Excellent support and lateral stability Good level of foot protection Reasonable weight for style of shoe Weather resistant uppers Surprisingly good pedaling efficiency Cons Stiff uppers take a few rides to break in Expensive Stiff sole doesnt flex much when walking Jeremy Benson When Fox Racing launched its line of Union mountain bike shoes recently, it became one of the few brands that can outfit riders from head to toe with helmets, apparel, pads, and now footwear, too. The Union BOA ($250) sits at the top-of-the-line model in their modest range of three shoes, and it quickly became a tester favorite for its versatility and all-around performance.

　　While the Union BOA is used by downhill racers at the top end of the sport, we found it to be impressively versatile. This has to do with several factors, one of which is the reasonable weight. At just 867g for the pair in size 9.5 US, this is in the realm of most trail riding shoes and makes it a viable option for those pedaling to the top of their descents or heading out for long, grueling trail rides. Another factor is the sole stiffness. The reinforced nylon shank provides a solid platform that provides excellent pedaling efficiency for most styles of riding short of XC racing.

　　Of course, Fox didnt stop there. The midsole is cushioned with EVA foam, which helps to mute trail feedback during descents. The molded toe cap and heel are reinforced to offer protection against rock strikes, and the shoe has a robust and tough feel. This is partially to do with the weather-resistant welded uppers that easily shrug off abrasion and water. The cleat box is long and offers ample adjustment range for folks to mount their cleats in their preferred location, plus it is surrounded by a full-coverage Ultratac rubber outsole for lateral stability on the pedals and traction off the bike.

　　The Union BOA has a standard fit that feels very average in terms of width and volume, and we found them to fit true to size when going off their US sizing (the EU sizing seems to run a bit smaller than other brands). The BOA dials make it quick and easy to get the shoes on and off and allow for on-the-fly tension adjustments. Additionally, Fox has included insoles with adjustable arch support, so you can hopefully dial it into your needs. Perforations above the toes and on the sides of the foot do a commendable job of ventilating and allowing the feet to breathe on hot days.

　　Out of the box, we found the uppers to feel a bit stiff, but they broke in nicely after just a few rides. The stiff soles offer excellent power transfer, but the limited flex through the toes doesnt make them the best for extended hike-a-bikes. Theyre also fairly expensive, but you can opt for the standard Union with laces and a Velcro strap and save yourself a bit of cash. Or, if you like a more pillowy feel at a slightly lower price, the Crankbrothers Mallet BOA ($200) is our other favorite gravity-oriented shoe.

　　Regardless, the Fox Union BOA is an excellent entry into the shoe market, and we feel it is one of the best burly mountain bike shoes weve tested in recent years.

　　Check Price at Evo$250 at AmazonCheck Price at Backcountry Best Mountain Bike Shoes for Adventure Riding and Bike Packing Pearl Izumi X-Alp Summit Specs Weight (pair) 780 g (size 43.5) Closure BOA dial and Velcro strap Intended use Trail riding, adventure riding, bikepacking Available sizes 39-49 EU (whole sizes only)

　　Pros Good blend of on- and off-bike performance Grippy Vibram soles for hike-a-bikes Stiff enough for most types of non-competitive riding Cons Only available in full EU sizes Not the stiffest Can feel pedal slightly through sole Jeremy Benson If your riding leans more toward the adventurous side of the spectrum or you regularly embark and multi-day bike-packing jaunts, then the Pearl Izumi X-Alp Summit ($150) is a shoe to consider. While they are certainly suitable for everyday trail riding, one of their greatest strengths is their performance off the bike. These shoes are comfortable, relatively lightweight, and offer a blend of on and off-the-bike performance that sets them apart from most other models on the market.

　　To be clear, these arent the highest-performance shoes around. Those seeking a super stiff sole and the utmost pedaling efficiency will be a little disappointed by the middling stiffness of the X-Alp Summit. For more casual trail riding, however, the nylon composite soles offer adequate stiffness, assuming you arent trying to PR every climb. The middle-of-the-road stiffness is also why they work so well off the bike. The soles have ample flex through the toes, and when combined with the aggressively lugged Vibram ECOSTEP rubber outsoles, they make walking in loose conditions or scrambling over chunky rocks feel quite similar to wearing hiking shoes.

　　Overall, the fit is fairly neutral, about average from the heel through the mid-foot, and slightly roomier up in the toe box. Folks with average to slightly above average width feet will get along with them well, but those with narrow feet may find them to be a little too roomy. The synthetic uppers are quite supple and relatively thin, helping to give them a light and airy feel on the feet, with ventilation enhanced by perforations above the toes and along the sides of the feet. A single BOA L6 dial pulls tension over the upper and mid-foot, along with a Velcro strap to snug things up down by the toes. The uppers arent the most supportive, but they certainly are quite comfortable.

　　While the X-Alp Summit shoes fit into their niche very nicely, they sacrifice a bit of performance in some areas as a result. The soles are far from the stiffest out there, and you can feel it flex a tiny bit under hard pedaling efforts and the cleat is slightly noticeable under the ball of the foot. They also offer very little in the way of foot protection, and vibration dampening isnt on par with most of the trail or gravity shoes we tested. They also only come in whole EU sizes, so those between sizes may have a harder time getting the perfect fit. For a slightly stiffer pedaling platform, more sizing options, and more casual style, the Specialized 2FO Roost Clip ($130) is worth a look.

　　Those concerns aside, the Pearl Izumi X-Ap Summit is a sensible option for the rider who prioritizes off-the-bike traction and walkability and wants a comfortable shoe that performs quite well on the bike too. If youre the type of rider who scrambles to every vista point or likes going on far-flung adventures that involve pushing your bike for extended periods, these may be just the shoes youre looking for. Adventurous ladies will also be happy to know they make the X-Alp Summit Womens.

　　$150 at REI$150 at PEARL iZUMi Best of the Rest Crankbrothers Mallet BOA Specs Weight (pair) 860 g (size 43.5) Closure BOA L6 dial and upper Velcro strap Intended use Trail, enduro, gravity Available sizes 5-14 US (half sizes 5.5-12.5)

　　Pros Super comfortable Ample foot protection Easy to walk in Good power transfer Comes with Crankbrothers cleats preinstalled Available in Speedlace and Lace versions Cons Ventilation could be better Jeremy Benson The Crankbrothers Mallet BOA ($200) is a clipless model that was designed to meet the needs of enduro and downhill racers and riders. While it may be aimed more at gravity-fueled riding disciplines, this versatile shoe is also great for trail riding with a reasonable weight, good pedaling efficiency, and supernatural comfort. The Mallet shoes also come in Speedlace and Lace versions that will save you $30 and $50, respectively.

　　Given its extensive line of pedals, it makes sense that Crankbrothers designed its shoes to work in combination with them, and they even include a set of Crankbrothers cleats pre-installed on all Mallet shoes. If you ride Crankbrothers pedals you get a fresh set of cleats, and all you need to do is position them in your preferred location to be ready to roll. If you ride any other brand of pedals, fear not — the Mallets also work with any mountain bike pedals that use 2-bolt cleats. The Match Box cleat box is generously sized and allows for ample side-to-side and fore-aft adjustability, including the Race Zone for those who like to slam their cleats way back for stability on the descents.

　　Getting in and out of these shoes is quick and easy with a single BOA Li2 dial and a Velcro strap at the top of the tongue, both of which make it a snap to dial in the tension for a secure and stable hold of the foot. Our test pair fit true to size with an average width that should work for most peoples feet. Weve heard others mention the EU sizing runs a tad big, however, so it might be good to try these on before you buy to ensure you get the correct size. Despite the tough and almost rubbery feel, the synthetic uppers are quite supple and conform nicely to your foot shape, and the padded tongue keeps the BOA wires from digging into the tarsal bones. Generous padding in the heel/ankle pocket is both plush and protective, and small silicone dots at the back of the heel help hold it in place.

　　The sole isnt super stiff, but it feels very well-balanced, and at no point did it feel like it was sapping power or efficiency, even on long trail rides with lots of climbing. Its also well-damped and absorbs trail feedback and vibration to keep your feet feeling fresh. Other than the cleat box, the sole is fully covered with Match MC1 rubber that provides great grip off the bike, and the horizontal tread at the toe and heel works to add some traction when walking in loose dirt. A generous sole rocker and a little flex through the toes make walking feel impressively natural. A sturdy rubber bumper wraps up over the toes for protection from rock strikes, and the whole package feels tough and well-made.

　　Though the Mallet BOA is billed as a downhill and enduro race shoe, the reasonable weight of 860g for the pair (size 43.5) makes them well suited to any type of riding youre doing short of XC racing, and they quickly became the go-to for after-work trail rides. This versatility makes them a great candidate for a one-shoe quiver if you split your riding between the bike park, enduro laps, and trail riding. Our only real complaint is that they arent the most breathable, and they can get a bit sweaty in hot weather. If breathability is high on your list, the Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA ($220) provides a bit better ventilation along with a slightly stiffer sole.

　　Check Price at BackcountryCheck Price at Jenson USA Ride Concepts Accomplice Clip BOA Specs Weight (pair) 864 g (size 9.5) Closure Single BOA L6 dial with textile TX4 laces Intended Use Trail Available Sizes 7 15 US (half sizes 7.5 12.5)

　　Pros Breathable upper Grippy sole Reasonable price for BOA equipped shoe Grippy soles Comfy slip-tongue design Good looks Cons Low volume fit may not work for everyone No water resistance Uppers arent the most supportive Jeremy Benson The Ride Concepts Accomplice Clip BOA ($150) is a relatively new addition to the brands growing lineup. This unique-looking shoe employs a highly breathable upper and comfy slip-tongue design with a BOA lacing system and textile TX4 laces. This design has some advantages and drawbacks, but overall, its a solid all-around trail riding option and a good value for a shoe with a BOA closure.

　　While they have a silhouette similar to that of many other modern trail and gravity-oriented mountain bike shoes, the Accomplice Clip BOA looks somewhat unique. This is mostly due to the lightweight nylon tech upper material along with the slip-tongue design. The textile upper gives the shoes a more casual look and also aids in breathability compared to shoes that use synthetic leather. You can feel the air passing through these shoes. The slip-tongue is a stretch affair that wraps the whole foot and is immediately comfortable, although it does take a little more effort to pull on than shoes with more traditional tongues that open wider.

　　Ride Concepts calls the fit of the Accomplice Clip BOA low volume, and wed agree. The mid-foot feels relatively average, but the toebox is fairly snug, even on our low-volume foot. If you have wider toes, you may get away with sizing up, but these are a good candidate for trying on before you buy to make sure they work for you. Fortunately, they broke in a little after a few rides, and ours got a tad roomier but still low-volume. A single BOA L6 dial tightens TX4 laces over the top of the feet. The textile laces move very easily, pull even tension, and dont dig into the tarsal bones the way other BOA laces can. The slip-tongue is moderately padded, as is the ankle cuff, and the heel stays nicely in place, even while walking.

　　Underfoot, an EVA midsole provides some cushioning, and a nylon shank stiffens up the sole for pedaling efficiency. Still, these arent the stiffest shoes around, but they are appropriate for the intended use of more casual, everyday trail riding. The entire sole is covered in Ride Concepts CLIP GRIP rubber outsole and signature hexagonal tread pattern. This provides relatively good traction off the bike, although the limited flex through the toes makes hiking up steep slopes feel a little clunky. A 42 mm long cleat box provides a massive range of adjustability for all riders to get their cleats positioned just how they want.

　　Theres little not to like about the Accomplice Clip BOA shoes, but the low-volume fit, especially in the forefoot, will be a limiting factor for many riders. The breathable upper makes them a solid choice for warm to hot weather, but it provides virtually no water resistance and is not ideal for wetter climates. The material also doesnt support the foot laterally quite as well as materials with a bit more structure, and the texture hangs on to dust and dirt and isnt the easiest to keep clean. If youre willing to spend a bit more, the Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA ($220) provides a more accommodating fit, a slightly stiffer sole, a bit more water resistance, and walks a little better, too.

　　Still, the Accomplice Clip BOA is a solid value for riders seeking a reasonably priced, casually styled shoe for general trail riding in mostly dry conditions. These shoes look good, breathe well, and are quite comfortable if they fit your foot.

　　Check Price at EvoCheck Price at Jenson USA Giro Chamber II Specs Weight (pair) 1,072 g (44) Closure Laces and Velcro strap Intended use Gravity, enduro, aggressive trail Available sizes 35-50 EU (whole sizes only)

　　Pros Comfortable, pillowy feel Ample foot protection Surprisingly good power transfer Less expensive than some similar options Cons Heavier weight Bulky Only available in full EU sizes Not well-ventilated Jeremy Benson Watch any Enduro World Series race and youre sure to see many of the riders battling for the podium wearing the Giro Chamber II ($150). A staple in the Giro mountain bike shoe lineup for many years, the Chamber II remains a popular model among the gravity and enduro crowd and even some aggressive trail and all-mountain riders. These shoes are heavily padded and offer great foot protection, though they come with a bit of extra heft and bulk as a result.

　　One of the first things youll notice about the Chamber II is the plush and pillowy feel, as there is a lot of cushioned padding around the ankle, heel, and tongue. Our size 44 test pair fit true to size with width and volume on the generous side of average, which should work for a huge portion of riders. Simple laces work well to secure the shoe on the feet, with a wide Velcro strap at the top of the tongue to lock the heel down and secure your laces. The feet feel very well protected thanks in part to all the padding, but also the rubber toe cap and wider-than-average sole that helps ward off rock strikes.

　　Given their cushy comfort and skate-shoe styling, the soles with a tri-molded shank are stiffer than expected and provide a very solid pedaling platform while the EVA footbed and EVA midsole do a fine job of muting trail feedback and impacts. The entire sole is covered in Vibram Megagrip rubber for both pedal and off-the-bike grip, while a little flex in the forefoot allows for a relatively normal walking motion. The cleat box is offset heavily to the inside which helps avoid crank arm rub with the chunky soles, and Giro advertises a 10mm setback to the cleat mount zone compared to their regular shoes. This will likely be the sweet spot for a lot of riders, though it doesnt have quite as much adjustment range as some other gravity shoes we tested.

　　All that pillowy comfort and foot protection does come with a bit of a weight penalty, and the Chamber II are the heaviest shoes we tested at 1,072g for our size 44 test pair. Theyre also just generally kinda big and bulky compared to more streamlined models. Our only other qualm is that they only come in full EU sizes, so finding the perfect fit may be a little harder for some people. If youre looking for something with a little less heft, the Fox Union BOA ($250) weighs quite a bit less and is equally burly for aggressive riding.

　　Otherwise, the Giro Chamber II is a great shoe for those who dont mind a little extra weight for a comfortable and protective shoe for gravity-oriented riding that retains solid pedaling performance.

　　$150 at evo$107 at AmazonCheck Price at Backcountry Specialized S-Works Recon Specs Weight (pair) 590 g (43.5) Closure Dual BOA dials Intended use XC, gravel Available sizes 36-49 EU (half sizes 38.5-46.5)

　　Pros Incredible power transfer Very lightweight Slick looks Tunable pontoon height/pedal interface Cons Very expensive Limited foot protection Not great for walking Lots of exposed carbon on sole Jeremy Benson Specialized uses the S-Works moniker on its top-of-the-line, race-ready bikes and other products, including shoes. The Specialized S-Works Recon ($450) is their range-topping mountain bike shoe aimed squarely at the XC racing and gravel riding crowd. These shoes recently got a complete redesign, addressing some of the complaints about the previous version while making them lighter, sleeker, more accommodating, and better-looking than ever.

　　Many high-end XC racing shoes are essentially copies of road bike shoes, so its not too surprising that the S-Works Recon looks nearly identical to the S-Works Torch road shoe. Of course, there are some minor differences, but they are the same in many ways. One of those is the full carbon fiber sole that is incredibly stiff, thin, and lightweight with an Internal I-Beam for added strength. These soles have a very low stack and dont flex under power, no matter how hard you mash on the pedals. The uppers and closures are the same as the Torch as well, and while they are incredibly supple and comfortable, its easy to get a very snug, stable, and secure fit that helps further enhance both efficiency and control.

　　One of the big changes to the new S-Works Recon is more width in the forefoot which should be accommodating to more riders compared to the narrower fit of the previous version. While this will be less ideal for those with narrow feet, the new arrangement of the dual BOA S3 dials manages to secure and snug the shoes for a precise fit and easy micro-adjustments. Additionally, the ankle cuff has been redesigned to be lower to prevent irritation and allow for excellent ankle mobility, while the heel pocket is snug with friction material added to keep your heel firmly in place. Specialized included its Body Geometry design into the shoe and footbed with the goal of aligning the lower leg, and the footbed provides great support despite being thin and firm.

　　The is a lot of visible carbon fiber on the sole of the S-Works Recon, but Specialized added beefy, but not replaceable, lugs at the toe and heel, a small patch of rubber under the instep, and large pontoons on either side of the cleat. The pontoons are tuneable, and the shoes come with shims, so you can adjust their height to dial in the shoe-pedal interface to your liking or specific pedals. Specialized also offers additional 3mm, 6mm, and 9mm shims and a cleat stacker should you need to account for leg length discrepancies. The aim of the tuneable pontoons is to provide a road bike-esque connection to the pedals for enhanced pedaling efficiency. In the stock configuration, our test shoes mated very well with all the different pedals we used them with.

　　Weight is also a concern for racers, so its not surprising that the S-Works Recon is absurdly lightweight at just 590g for our size 43.5 test pair. This is particularly impressive given how stiff, secure, and stable they are on the feet. Breathability is also fairly good, mostly due to the super thin and light construction of the shoes.

　　As with most XC racing shoes, foot protection is very minimal and is limited to a small rubber bumper in front of the toes and the asymmetrical plastic heel cup. Theres also virtually no sole damping of any kind. And, while it is definitely possible to walk in these shoes, the unflinching stiffness of the sole and all the exposed carbon make these a very poor choice for rides that involve much time off the bike, especially if there are sharp rocks involved. Additionally, the wider fit in the forefoot may be too roomy for the narrow-footed among us. They are also very, very expensive. For similar performance with a slight weight penalty, the Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) can save you a good bit of cash.

　　That said, if youre seeking the top-level performance and comfort these shoes provide for XC or gravel racing, the cost of the Specialized S-Works Recon shoes may well be justified.

　　Read Review: WorldTour Winning Cycling Shoe Gets Gravel Treatment: Specialized S-Works Recon First Look

　　Check Price at BackcountryCheck Price at Jenson USA Five Ten Hellcat Pro Specs Weight (pair) 905 g (10 US) Closure Laces and Velcro strap Intended use Gravity, enduro, aggressive trail Available sizes 4-15 US (half sizes 4.5-12.5)

　　Pros Great power transfer Adequate foot protection Lighter than previous version Reasonable ventilation Cons Soles dont absorb vibration as well as similar shoes Reports of sole durability issues Stiff sole is a little clunky for walking Jeremy Benson The latest iteration of the Five Ten Hellcat Pro ($180) has been around for a couple of years and has improved on the heavy and bulky predecessor in several ways. Its still the burliest clipless model in the Five Ten lineup and is designed to meet the demands of downhill and enduro riders and racers. Given the significant reduction in weight compared to the old version, however, the Hellcat Pros appeal has expanded to include trail riders seeking extra foot protection on aggressive trails.

　　Despite the downhill focus of the Hellcat Pro, it has a surprisingly stiff sole that helps make it an efficient pedaler. Whether youre grinding uphill for another lap or laying down the power in a sprint, theres really no noticeable flex in the sole underfoot or torsionally. This translates to the descents as well, where the sole supports the foot and doesnt flex around the pedal. It offers moderate vibration dampening, though not quite as much as some similar models. Full coverage Stealth Marathon rubber soles with Five Tens signature raised dot tread pattern provide good traction on firm surfaces and is harder-wearing than the rubber found on the brands flat pedal shoes. While these shoes are okay to walk in, the minimal sole rocker and stiffness through the toes make them feel a little blocky underfoot.

　　We found the Hellcat Pro to fit true to size with average volume through the mid-foot and a slightly roomier forefoot. The fit of these shoes will be welcome for those with wider feet but may prove to be a bit spacious for those on the narrow end of the spectrum. The laces work very well to secure the shoes snugly over the tops of the feet, and the broad Velcro strap at the top of the tongue helps keep the heel planted firmly in the heel pocket and keeps the laces tidy. A large mesh panel on the outside of the mid-foot and some perforations above the toes do a commendable job of ventilating, though these are far from the airiest shoes around. Given the gravity-oriented focus of the Hellcat Pro, foot protection levels are high, particularly at the front of the shoe, where the toebox is heavily reinforced and coated in abrasion-resistant material.

　　While our test pair has held up well, we have seen friends Hellcat Pros suffer from sole delamination issues. A quick search online reveals that this isnt an isolated problem, but it doesnt affect all of the shoes either. Its safe to assume that Adidas/Five Ten is addressing the issue, and it is typically covered by warranty should yours suffer the same fate.

　　Based on our experience, however, the Five Ten Hellcat Pro is a solid option for trail, enduro, and gravity riders seeking a protective and stiff shoe for tackling aggressive terrain and riding at high speeds. If you prefer a BOA closure system, the Fox Union BOA ($220) is strikingly similar but a little quicker and easier to get on and off the feet.

　　$171 at AmazonCheck Price at Backcountry Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon Specs Weight (pair) 662 g (43.5) Closure Large Velcro strap and BOA dial Intended use XC, gravel, cyclocross Available sizes 36-48 EU (half sizes 37.5-46.5)

　　Pros Lightweight Stiff; excellent power transfer Less expensive than other high-end XC shoes Rubber sole tread covers most of the carbon midsole Well-ventilated Cons Still fairly expensive Minimal foot protection Limited padding in heel and on tongue could cause discomfort for those with sensitive feet Jeremy Benson The Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) tops the brands range of performance off-road shoes geared towards XC and gravel racers. These shoes borrow some features from Fiziks popular road models, and they are lightweight, super stiff, and minimalist in their design. They also cost a fair bit less than other brands top-of-the-line models, though, at $300, they still arent exactly inexpensive either.

　　The Vento Ferox Carbon has, not surprisingly, a full X1 carbon sole that has a 10/10 on Fiziks sole stiffness index. This stiffness is in line with their top road cycling shoes and ensures that none of your precious watts get wasted when smashing down on the pedals. Our size 43.5 test pair fit true to size with an average width that avoids being excessively narrow or too spacious. The uppers are made from a tough but thin and lightweight woven mesh and laminated upper secured over the foot with a BOA Li2 dial and a wide Powerstrap at the top of the tongue. We found it easy to crank these shoes down over the feet for a very snug and secure fit from the forefoot to the heel, and small grippy dots at the back of the heel pocket help to prevent any unwanted heel lift. This secure fit further enhances pedaling efficiency and power transfer throughout the entire pedal stroke.

　　Most of the carbon sole is covered by rubber with small lugs at the toes, larger lugs under the heel, and long pontoons bordering the cleat box. Not only does this protect the carbon from damage, but it also allows you to walk reasonably sure-footed, and the pontoons interface quite well with pedals for increased contact and stability. The Ferox Carbon is also ready to accept toe spikes for you CX racers, although it doesnt come with them. Ventilation is a strong suit as the thin uppers allow plenty of air to reach the feet. The reinforced toe cap and rigid molded heel provide protection on par with other cross-country shoes, though it is quite minimal.

　　While the Vento Ferox Carbon are undoubtedly excellent shoes for laying down the power and maximizing your efficiency, we found that the minimalist design could lead to some minor discomfort over the course of longer rides. There is very little padding in the heel pocket or the tongue, and those with sensitive tarsal bones or heels may start to develop hot spots after several hours of riding, but this may not be an issue for everyone. Similarly, and this goes for most carbon-soled race shoes, the soles offer very little in the way of vibration dampening. If youve got wiggle room in the budget, we found the Shimano S-Phyre XC9 ($450) to be a bit more comfortable and slightly lighter, too.

　　Still, the Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon has a lot to offer those looking for a stiff, lightweight, and well-ventilated shoe for gravel or XC that costs less than the competition.

　　$340 at AmazonCheck Price at Backcountry Giro Sector Specs Weight (pair) 708 g (43.5) Closure Dual BOA dials Intended use Light trail, XC, gravel Available sizes 39-50 EU (half sizes 42.5-45.5)

　　Pros Breathable Synchwire upper Good power transfer Easily adjustable Less expensive than high-end XC shoes Cons Slightly heavier than more expensive models Not as stiff as top-ranked XC shoes Limited foot protection Jeremy Benson The Giro Sector ($240) is a lightweight shoe geared toward cross-country and gravel riders thats made with Giros proprietary Synchwire upper material. Though they arent quite as stiff or light as the top-of-the-line racing shoes we tested, they also cost significantly less and offer a more balanced performance that most non-racers and even some racers may prefer.

　　One of the primary things that set the Sector apart from similarly styled shoes is the use of Giros Synchwire material. This mesh-like material is quite unique in that it is very flexible and incredibly air-permeable yet still quite supportive. In the case of the Sector, it also has a thermo-bonded exo structure that provides a little additional support and structure to the uppers while still leaving plenty of room for these to be some of the best-ventilated shoes we tested. These shoes ventilate so well that riding in brisk conditions can be a bit chilling, so its definitely worth considering the climate where you ride. They also allow water to pass through freely, but they dry pretty quickly as well.

　　Slipping them on, the comfort is immediately apparent as the uppers conform to the feet easily, and the Giro 3D-molded medium arch support footbed cradles it nicely from below. Our size 43.5 test pair fit true to size with an average width, and the dual BOA L6 dials secure the shoes over the top of the feet and allow for micro increases to tension or full macro-release. We found it easy to get these shoes as tight as you want to really lock your feet and heels in place.

　　The sole is made with a carbon composite plate that is adequately stiff for most types of riding. It cant match the unrivaled stiffness of full carbon soles, but instead, it feels solid underfoot while remaining a bit more forgiving than full-on race shoes. This is particularly noticeable over the course of a long gravel ride or chunky mountain bike descent, as they dont punish your feet the way that some stiffer shoes can. Pedaling efficiency isnt top of the heap, though it isnt far off thanks to the relatively stiff sole and precise fit. The sole is covered in rubber from front to back to provide off-the-bike grip and a reasonable walking experience. The lack of well-defined lugs, however, doesnt give them the best traction in loose dry, or muddy conditions.

　　For those who dont need a super airy shoe, the Crankbrothers Candy Lace ($160) is worth checking out. The soles are a touch less stiff, but they are a bit nicer to walk in and have a classic, almost retro style that we think looks great. Plus, youll save a bit of dough for new bike parts, too.

　　If youre looking for a super comfortable and well-ventilated shoe for light trail, cross-country, or gravel riding, we feel the Giro Sector is a great option that looks good, fits great, and isnt super expensive. Female riders will also be happy to know that Giro makes a womens version of the Sector as well.

　　$144 at AmazonCheck Price at Backcountry Five Ten Kestrel BOA Specs Weight (pair) 724 g (9.5 US) Closure BOA dial and 2 Velcro straps Intended use XC, downcountry, gravel Available sizes 6-14 US (half sizes 6.5-12.5)

　　Pros Great power transfer More protective than typical XC shoes Sole lugs provide good walking traction Less expensive than many XC shoes Cons Higher volume fit in forefoot; may be roomy for narrow feet Slightly heavier than other XC-style shoes Jeremy Benson The new Five Ten Kestrel BOA ($230) is a dramatic departure from its predecessor and a unique entry into the shoe market from the traditionally more gravity-oriented brand. They claim it pairs XC performance with Five Tens gravity credentials and mountain bike expertise, and it is marketed as a down-country shoe with some design elements that speak to the brands roots.

　　The previous Kestrel Pro BOA was a beefy shoe for aggressive trail riders and enduro racers, and the latest version resembles its predecessor in name only. This shoe is aimed squarely at the growing down-country market that has been spurred on by the evolution of more capable XC bikes. The full-length glass-fiber reinforced sole is very stiff, and power transfer felt on par with some of the more expensive competition. This took us somewhat by surprise actually, as we didnt expect such good pedaling efficiency. The heel pocket is well-shaped, and the BOA closure over the upper foot does a great job of locking the heel down in place.

　　While some of the rigid sole is exposed, much of it is covered in Five Tens signature Stealth Marathon rubber. This includes a small patch under the instep, as well as aggressive lugs at the toe and heel that provide excellent traction in loose soils. While the soles are quite stiff, these shoes are a bit more friendly to walk in than some similar models. The cleat bolt channels offer a huge range of adjustment, especially for an XC shoe, and are bordered by two large pontoons that help you stabilize on the pedals. Additionally, Five Ten added a beefy piece of rubber that wraps up and over the toes to ward off rock strikes when youre getting aggressive on your XC rig.

　　Our test pair fit true to size in length. They have a nice snug fit in the heel and ankle and are slightly higher volume in the forefoot than most other XC shoes. Weve read complaints from others that they werent able to adequately tension the shoes over the forefoot, but we were able to get them snug enough with the two Velcro straps. We got along fine with the fit with thicker socks, but it may be worth trying these on before you buy to make sure the volume jives with your feet. Those with narrower/lower-volume feet might find a more precise fit in a shoe like the Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) but with a bit less foot protection.

　　The ventilated mesh panel above the toes and on both sides of the feet works effectively. And, while they arent the lightest shoes out there, theyre still fairly lightweight at 724g for the pair. We came away pleasantly surprised by the performance of the new Five Ten Kestrel BOA, which is a solid option for those who want XC performance with a bit of added foot protection. They come in two color options, and they are also offered in a womens version with two different colorways.

　　$230 at AmazonCheck Price at BackcountryCheck Price at Jenson USA Ride Concepts Hellion Clip Specs Weight (pair) 960 g (size 9.5 US) Closure Laces and Velcro strap Intended use Trail, enduro, gravity Available sizes 7-15 US (half sizes 7.5-12.5)

　　Pros Good power transfer Great lateral stability Fair price Good level of damping Ample foot protection Cons Velcro seems to wear out relatively quickly Ventilation could be better A tad heavy Jeremy Benson The Hellion Clip ($150) is one of several clipless models in Ride Concepts line of trail and gravity-oriented mountain bike shoes. They essentially took their popular Hellion flat pedal shoes and added a cleat plate and a Velcro strap at the top of the tongue, and voila. Weve been riding in these shoes off and on for the past year and came away mostly impressed by their performance. Ride Concepts also makes a full line of womens shoes, including the Hellion Clip Womens.

　　One of the things that stands out about the Hellion Clip is their sturdy and robust feel. The supportive uppers provide excellent foot stability along with a reinforced toe cap and padded heel/ankle that provide ample foot protection for everything from aggressive trail riding to bike park use. The cushioned EVA midsole does a great job of absorbing and muting trail feedback, and along with insoles that feature D30 padding under the heel and forefoot, provide comfort on long, rough descents.

　　Out of the box, we found the Hellion Clip to fit true to size in length with a relatively snug initial fit. After a few rides, the upper broke in quite nicely and has stayed snug and secure, with a glove-like feel. As advertised, these are relatively low-volume shoes that should work well for those with narrow to average-width feet. The lace closure is simple and effectively tensions the shoe over the upper and midfoot, and the Velcro strap ensures that your heel stays securely in the heel pocket. They lack the on-the-fly-adjustability of the BOA-equipped models, but we rarely found the need to adjust the laces once these shoes were on.

　　Given their skate shoe-esque looks, the Hellion Clip shoes are surprisingly stiff underfoot and provide an efficient pedaling experience. The RC Powerdrive nylon shank provides support and a solid pedaling platform, and it feels very stable laterally as well. The entire sole, minus the cleat box, is covered in Clip Grip rubber, which provides good grip and off-the-bike walking traction. They dont have a lot of flex through the toe, but there is just enough to prevent them from feeling too clunky when walking.

　　Compared to some similar models we tested, the Hellion Clip is a little bit heavier, weighing in at 960g for the pair in a size 9.5 US. Thats about 100g more than the Fox Union BOA ($250) or the Crankbrothers Mallet BOA ($220) in the same size. Its not a deal breaker, but its notable if youre concerned at all about weight. Also, the grip of the Velcro on the strap has degraded over the course of the past year of use, and though it still works, it seems like a bit of a weak point in these otherwise durable shoes. Despite these concerns, wed recommend the Ride Concepts Hellion Clip to anyone seeking a versatile shoe with a precise, low-volume fit that can handle everything from trail riding to bike park days.

　　Check Price at BackcountryCheck Price at Jenson USA Fizik Terra Atlas Specs Weight (pair) 758 g (43.5) Closure Single BOA dial Intended use trail riding, gravel Available sizes 36-48 EU (half sizes 37.5-46.5)

　　Pros Comfortable Supple uppers conform nicely to the feet Good off the bike traction Pretty good ventilation Cons Not the best power transfer Uppers arent the most supportive Jeremy Benson The Fizik Terra Atlas ($160) is a moderately priced shoe that combines a comfortable fit with an all-around performance that many riders will appreciate. While it may not be the lightest or stiffest shoe around, it offers a nice balanced ride that should work for everything from casual XC riding to gravel or bike packing for riders without competitive aspirations.

　　The Terra Atlas has a nylon plate to provide pedaling support, and it falls at a 5 out of 10 on Fiziks sole stiffness scale. While it is noticeably flexy under very hard efforts compared to the 10-rated Fizik Veto Ferox Carbon, we didnt find it to be excessively soft under power or fatiguing to the lower legs or feet. Ample flex through the toe of the shoe allows for a natural walking motion off the bike, and the grippy rubber outsole provides good traction on most surfaces. The cleat mount area offers a generous adjustment range that should accommodate most riders preferences.

　　The supple uppers of the Terra Atlas feel great right out of the box, and we found the length to be true to size. The width feels a touch wider than other Fizik shoes weve tested, but not excessively voluminous. A single BOA dial pulls tension over the asymmetric opening and tongue of the shoe to tighten the entire thing from the top down to the forefoot. While this works okay, it can be a little tricky to get even tension throughout, especially if you need to decrease volume closer to the toes. This seems partially due to the fact that the wires crisscross and tend to hang up on each other. And, while we found the supple uppers to be very comfortable, they arent the most supportive.

　　The uppers and tongue are heavily perforated and do a good job of ventilating the feet. The construction seems solid, too, with good attention to detail and quality craftsmanship. Foot protection, however, is quite limited, so thats something to be aware of depending on the type of riding that youre doing. The Pearl Izumi X-Alp Summit ($150) is quite similar in terms of sole stiffness, but it has a roomier fit and a more aggressive sole for hiking.

　　Overall, the Fizik Terra Atlas is a versatile and comfortable shoe for those who arent too concerned with having super stiff soles. They feel good on the feet, and we think they look pretty good too.

　　$192 at AmazonCheck Price at Backcountry Mountain Bike Shoes Comparison Chart

　　Modern trail riding shoes like the Ride Concepts Accomplice Clip BOA are a good choice for the vast majority of riders; (photo/Heather Benson) What Type of Riding Do You Do? The type of riding you do will be the primary factor to consider when choosing the right pair of mountain bike shoes. If the majority of your riding falls into a specific category like cross-country or gravity, shoes designed for that specific purpose will serve you the best. If youre more of a generalist, then a versatile trail-riding shoe is probably the way to go. If you dabble in multiple disciplines, having multiple different pairs of shoes to match the type of riding youre doing is not uncommon.

　　Types of Mountain Bike Shoes Given the various categories that mountain biking is divided into, it comes as little surprise that we have shoes specialized to meet the varying needs of riders and riding styles. In general, mountain biking can be broken into three primary categories: cross-country, trail/all-mountain, and gravity (downhill and enduro). We explain the primary differences in design and performance between the types of shoes below.

　　For mountain bike footwear, comfort and performance are key. We typically dont mind spending a bit more for a shoe like the Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA to get it; (photo/Jeremy Benson) Price Value The price of mountain bike shoes varies pretty significantly, with the models we tested ranging from $80 up to $450. Typically, the most expensive shoes have the highest performance, although that performance will only really be appreciated by certain riders for very specific reasons.

　　Budget If you dont have a lot of money to spend, fear not, there are some solid mountain bike shoes on the market that get the job done without breaking the bank. Budget-friendly shoes, between roughly $80 and $130, are typically less specific in their intended use, making them good options for those getting into the sport, less frequent, or more casual riders who dont demand the highest performance. Shoes in this price range typically have simpler designs, less exotic materials (no carbon fiber here), and use less expensive laces or Velcro for closures to help keep the price down.

　　Our favorite budget shoe is the Specialized 2FO Roost Clip ($130). These shoes combine casual styling with a balanced sole stiffness, grippy, walkable soles, and traditional laces. They are a great all-around option for general trail riding, plus they can usually be found on sale, which makes them an even better value. If youre on a tighter budget, even a shoe like the Giro Berm ($80) works well enough. They may not be the most stylish, but the comfortable fit, decent pedaling efficiency and easy walkability make them a very affordable entry point to clipless mountain bike shoes.

　　The Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA shoes are moderately priced, impressively versatile, and are one of our favorites; (photo/Heather Benson) Mid-Tier The $150 to $250 price range will be where most people find the best price-to-performance ratio. Here we find shoes that tend to be a little higher-performance, often with stiffer soles, BOA dials, and features that may make them better suited to more specific riding styles and the varying needs that go along with them. Still, many shoes in this price tier are generalists that can serve riders well across different disciplines, from everyday trail rides to laps at the bike park.

　　Our top-rated shoe for trail riding is the Crankbrothers Mallet Trail BOA ($220). This shoe provides an excellent blend of a solid pedaling platform, a comfortable fit, moderate foot protection, good off-the-bike traction, and a reasonable weight, making them well-suited for everything from backcountry epics to enduro racing. Similarly, the Giro Sector ($240) offers a similar fit, tech, and most of the performance of high-end race shoes but with a little more versatility and a more wallet-friendly price. The Sectors carbon composite sole isnt race shoe stiff but adequate to make them plenty efficient for high mileage XC, light trail, and gravel riding. Giros unique Synchwire uppers are super breathable, and two BOA dials make it easy to dial in the perfect fit.

　　Premium Above the $300 mark, we get into the high-end of the mountain bike shoe market. The majority of shoes in this price range are highly specialized and geared toward cross-country racers seeking shoes that combine low weight and the highest level of pedaling efficiency. Fancy materials like stiff carbon fiber soles, lightweight and breathable uppers, and BOA closures are the norm here, all of which contribute to driving the price up while keeping the weight down.

　　The top-rated Shimano S-Phyre XC9 ($450) is a prime example. These shoes have an ultra-stiff carbon sole, supple synthetic uppers, and dual BOA dials that provide a glove-like fit. With impressive pedaling efficiency and shockingly low weight, these shoes are a top choice for everyone from amateur racers to world-cup-level pros seeking marginal gains. Lower down in the premium price range, the Fizik Vento Ferox Carbon ($300) costs a fair amount less — even though it is still quite expensive — and performs similarly with only a small weight penalty.

　　While shoes at the upper end of the price spectrum may give some riders the performance advantages they need and want, they certainly arent the best choice for all riders. In fact, most non-competitive riders will be better served by moderately priced shoes that provide a better balance of performance attributes.

　　Frequently Asked Questions Why should I wear mountain bike shoes? Sure, you can ride a mountain bike in just about any shoes you want, but mountain bike shoes are always our recommendation because they are specifically designed for that purpose. If you mountain bike once or twice a year, it may not be worth it to you to spring for mountain bike specific shoes, but if you ride with any frequency, the performance benefits of shoes made for the purpose should not be overlooked.

　　Whether youre riding cross country, trail, enduro, or downhill, there are models designed to be optimal for each type of riding. Mountain bike shoes generally have more rigid soles to promote more efficient power transfer when pedaling and prevent foot fatigue when descending. Grippy outsoles provide traction on the pedals and when off the bike walking on varied terrain. Protective features like padding and reinforced areas are integrated into many designs to ward off rock strikes to the toes and heels. And, of course, shoes designed to be used with clipless pedals have a cleat mount area for the cleat that is necessary for clipping into the pedal.

　　Clipless vs. flat pedals, which is best? Theres really no right answer to this question as it typically comes down to personal preference and the type of riding youre doing. Each pedal style has pros and cons. Most riders choose one or the other, while some will switch back and forth to enjoy the benefits of both styles.

　　Clipless pedals provide a mechanical connection to the pedal, keep your feet in the perfect spot, and help to maximize your pedaling effort through the full pedal stroke. For this reason, they are typically preferred by cross-country riders/racers and others who put in big miles and want to be as efficient as possible. The downsides are that they take some getting used to and awkward falls are not uncommon when learning, and you generally have less foot mobility and freedom of movement.

　　Flat pedals and flat pedal shoes offer greater foot mobility with varying support and grip depending on the platform size, pin style/placement, and sole rubber/tread design. Flat pedals can be very grippy and secure, however, they do not provide a mechanical connection to the pedals, which results in a slight decrease in pedaling efficiency. It is also possible to bounce off the pedals in rough terrain or slip a foot off while climbing, which can be potentially very painful if/when the pedal pins make contact with your shins.

　　Why are they called clipless pedals if you clip in? The term clipless is definitely confusing due to the fact that you actually clip in to clipless pedals. The term clipless goes back decades, to a time when most pedals had toe clips, or toe cages, that wrapped up over the toe of your shoes to help prevent your feet from slipping off the front of the pedal. When Shimano developed its original SPD pedal system, it did not have the toe clip, and thus the term clipless was born. These days, clipless pedals are often referred to as clip, clip-in, and SPD, which are less confusing.

　　Can I use mountain bike shoes for road or gravel riding? Of course. While we generally recommend road-specific shoes for pure road cycling, theres no reason that you cant use mountain bike shoes for riding on the road or gravel bike. Generally speaking, cross-country style shoes will be the best fit for this as they tend to provide the best pedaling efficiency with stiffer soles and lighter weights. In theory, a shoe like the Shimano S-Phyre XC9 or the Specialized S-Works Recon could have you covered for XC, gravel, and road riding as long as you have the same pedals across all the bikes.

　　How much should I spend? This really depends on your budget, but also your needs and wants from your shoes. Prices vary quite significantly between the least and most expensive models we tested, as does performance. If youre seeking the highest in performance, particularly for cross-country riding and racing, then youll need to be willing and able to spend a bit more for high-end shoes to meet your performance expectations. Top-of-the-line cross-country shoes can cost upward of $400, but often, brands have several versions that cost less and offer similar features and performance.

　　Shoes for trail and gravity riding tend to be less expensive than their cross-country counterparts, although the high-end models can still cost up to around $250. That said, they have a more approachable price range, with models starting around $100-125 and performance differences being less dramatic than their XC counterparts. At the lowest end of the price spectrum, below $100, several brands make entry-level shoes that will serve more casual or infrequent riders well. These models cant compete with more expensive shoes, but they can absolutely get the job done, and they will work much better than riding in your old jogging shoes. Trust us.

　　The Best Gravel Bike Shoes of 2024 Steering your bike down chunky backroads in your future? Saddle up with one of the best gravel shoes on the market today.

　　The Best Hitch Bike Racks of 2024 We reviewed the best hitch bike racks for 2024 with options for every budget. Top picks include Thule, Kuat, RockyMounts, and more.